Champion synthesis - {{client}} - {{domain_or_initiative}}
Reference links (keep in every copy)
- Layer 2 exemplar/template: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H7GSLR-JdYQQs9PWQ4V6FfpbsfA-VQFr6tZajPwrSb8/edit
- Layer 1 reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RfMFm4r96JtE4vsIiXXwfuBaI-Btfe5AcmycYUAk1xI/edit
- Layer 3 reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dBrokZdifjXgEgNWU8hfTWYYtbQESGHMICdhb5u8tSo/edit
Doc meta
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Client | {{client}} |
| Domain / initiative | {{domain_or_initiative}} |
| Layer | 2 |
| Owner | {{bf_delivery_owner}} |
| Champion | {{champion_name}} |
| Linked Doc 1 | {{url_domain_prd}} |
| Linked Doc 3 | {{url_vp_memo}} |
| Linked Doc 4 | {{url_deck_prep}} |
| Linked Doc 5 | {{url_slides}} |
| Last reviewed | {{date}} |
Summary for champion
{{three_to_five_bullet_executive_summary}}
Sample text
- We now have clearer visibility into where reporting is reliable versus where manual lift is still high.
- The team is aligned on the core metric set, but source-of-truth sequencing decisions remain open.
- Next steps should prioritize ingestion pathway decisions before broad dashboard rollout.
Themes we are seeing
Sample text
- Discovery surfaced repeated manual workarounds across teams for the same business questions.
- Metric definition alignment is improving, but timing and source consistency remain risks.
- The delivery path is viable if rollout is gated by metric confidence, not by dashboard completion alone.
Open questions (BF)
Align with champion open questions: {{yes_no_notes}}
Sample text
- Which data objects should route through ERP first versus warehouse-first for reliability and speed?
- What is the minimum KPI set required for a credible interim VP update?
What we think happens next (proposal)
Sample text
- Run one additional validation loop with key SMEs on manual report intent.
- Lock ingestion path decision for the highest-impact metric cluster.
- Produce an interim executive update focused on themes, risks, and plan.
Risks / concerns
Sample text
- If source-path decisions remain open too long, model delivery will look active but confidence will remain low.
- If VP comms ship before champion alignment, the team will create avoidable rework.
Bridge notes (sync with EM + strategy before Doc 3)
Date / attendees:
Agreed report-up themes:
Sample text
- Agreed: report progress as “source and metric alignment underway” rather than “dashboard-ready.”
- Agreed: elevate two decision points to VP level, keep implementation detail in Doc 1.
Do not paste Doc 1 engineering depth here — link to Doc 1 instead.