Brainforge Qualification Criteria
Purpose: Define what makes a good lead for Brainforge Source: ICP Operating System (Notion) Last Updated: 2025-01-16
Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) - Executive Summary
Who We Exist For: We exist to be the AI-powered growth partner for data-driven companies as they scale: from building the first data foundation through scale-up execution and into mature market expansion. We serve operator-level leaders who already believe in data and AI, but need a partner who can move fast today without creating drag tomorrow.
What They’re Looking For: Our buyers are not looking for tools, dashboards, or headcount. They are looking for clarity, leverage, and outcomes—delivered at the speed their business actually operates.
Organizing Principle: We organize our ICP around company maturity, not industry or title. This allows us to partner long-term while staying precise about what matters now.
Growth Stages (ICP Segmentation)
Startups: Build it right without slowing down
Who they are:
- Post Series A, or 30M ARR/GMV companies
- Without a mature data team
What’s broken:
- Scrappy data, low trust
- Decisions made in spreadsheets
Why they hire us:
- They need a clean, scalable foundation that works immediately
- Won’t need to be rebuilt later
Our role:
- Lay the minimum viable data foundation
- Enables speed, trust, and future growth
Deal Size: 30K/month
Scale Ups: Turn data into growth leverage
Who they are:
- 100M ARR/GMV companies
- Scaling teams, channels, and products
What’s broken:
- Growth slowing
- Conflicting numbers
- Analytics teams bottlenecked
- AI tools underused
Why they hire us:
- They need one view of the business
- Clear answers on where to invest, fix, or stop
Our role:
- Create a single source of truth
- Surface growth constraints
- Operationalize analytics across teams
Deal Size: 40K/month
Unicorn/Enterprise Growth: Scale intelligence while fighting bureaucracy
Who they are:
- $500M+ ARR/GMV organizations
- Modern stacks
What’s broken:
- Complexity outpacing insight
- Manual workflows killing speed
- Decision-making not scaling
Why they hire us:
- They need AI and automation embedded into operations
- Not another layer of tools
Our role:
- Design and deploy AI systems that scale decision-making
- Preserve velocity while scaling
Deal Size: 100K+/month
Seasonal Champions: Activated by funding cycles, board deadlines, or operational stress
Who they are:
- Companies at any stage
- Activated by external pressure (funding, board, operational stress)
What’s broken:
- Urgent need for data/AI solutions
- Time-sensitive deadlines
- Need fast execution
Why they hire us:
- Speed to proof over endless roadmap discussions
- Need immediate results
Our role:
- Rapid deployment
- Quick wins
- Fast time to value
Deal Size: Variable (pilot-focused)
Company Characteristics
Revenue/Size Ranges:
- Startups: 30M ARR/GMV
- Scale Ups: 100M ARR/GMV
- Enterprise: $500M+ ARR/GMV
Stage:
- Post Series A minimum
- Growth stage companies
- Companies with operational pressure
Other Characteristics:
- Data-driven companies
- Operator-level leaders who believe in data and AI
- Companies needing speed without creating future drag
- Modern tech stacks (for enterprise)
Decision Maker Roles
Primary Decision Makers:
- Operator-level leaders (founders, executives)
- Leaders who already believe in data and AI
- Decision makers who need speed and leverage
Key Characteristics:
- Not looking for tools, dashboards, or headcount
- Looking for clarity, leverage, and outcomes
- Need partners who move at business speed
Pain Points (What Makes Them a Good Fit)
Pain Point 1: Scrappy Data, Low Trust (Startups)
- Description: Decisions made in spreadsheets, no reliable data foundation
- Signs they have it: Manual data processes, conflicting numbers, low trust in data
- How Brainforge solves it: Lay minimum viable data foundation that enables speed and trust
Pain Point 2: Growth Constraints, Conflicting Numbers (Scale Ups)
- Description: Growth slowing, analytics teams bottlenecked, AI tools underused
- Signs they have it: Multiple data sources, conflicting metrics, analytics bottlenecks
- How Brainforge solves it: Create single source of truth, surface growth constraints, operationalize analytics
Pain Point 3: Complexity Outpacing Insight (Enterprise)
- Description: Manual workflows killing speed, decision-making not scaling
- Signs they have it: Complex systems, slow decision-making, manual processes
- How Brainforge solves it: Design and deploy AI systems that scale decision-making while preserving velocity
Pain Point 4: Urgent Need (Seasonal Champions)
- Description: Funding cycles, board deadlines, operational stress creating urgency
- Signs they have it: Time-sensitive deadlines, external pressure, need fast results
- How Brainforge solves it: Speed to proof, rapid deployment, quick wins
Qualification Questions
BANT Framework (or Your Framework)
Budget:
- Question: “What’s your budget range for this type of work?”
- Signals:
- Mid-Market: 30K/month range
- Enterprise: 100K+/month range
- Initial pilots or workshops acceptable
- Red flags:
- No formal data/AI budget
- Seeking cheap execution
- Budget too low for engagement type
Authority:
- Question: “Who makes the final decision on this type of engagement?”
- Signals:
- Operator-level leaders (founders, executives)
- Leaders who already believe in data and AI
- Executive ownership (not delegated downward)
- Red flags:
- Delegating “AI” downward with no executive ownership
- No decision maker access
- Staff augmentation request (not strategic)
Need:
- Question: “What’s broken with your current data/AI approach?”
- Signals:
- Clear operational pain (scrappy data, conflicting numbers, bottlenecks)
- Growth constraints or complexity issues
- Urgent need (funding cycles, board deadlines, operational stress)
- Already believe in data and AI (not debating whether it matters)
- Red flags:
- Still debating whether data infrastructure matters
- Research-only with no business outcomes
- Optimizing vanity metrics without outcome ownership
- No operational pressure
Timeline:
- Question: “When do you need to see results?”
- Signals:
- Active project, ready to start
- Urgent need (funding cycles, board deadlines)
- Operational stress creating urgency
- Speed to proof over endless roadmap discussions
- Red flags:
- No timeline or urgency
- Slow procurement requirements (traditional enterprise)
- Rigid scopes that prevent speed
Brainforge-Specific Qualification
Question 1: [Your question]
- Good answer: [What you want to hear]
- Red flag: [What to watch out for]
Question 2: [Your question]
- Good answer: [What you want to hear]
- Red flag: [What to watch out for]
Question 3: [Your question]
- Good answer: [What you want to hear]
- Red flag: [What to watch out for]
Red Flags (Disqualification Criteria)
We Explicitly Do NOT Serve:
Company Stage Red Flags:
- Pre-revenue or early-stage teams without operational pressure
- Companies with <25 employees
- No formal data/AI budget
Buyer Intent Red Flags:
- Buyers seeking staff augmentation disguised as strategy
- Organizations still debating whether data infrastructure matters
- Buyers seeking cheap execution rather than business leverage
- Research-only initiatives with no tie to business outcomes
- Research-only initiatives with no operational or financial accountability
Buyer Type Red Flags:
- Traditional enterprise buyers who require slow procurement and rigid scopes
- Organizations still deciding whether to adopt a data warehouse
- Teams optimizing vanity metrics without ownership of outcomes
- Founders or managers delegating “AI” downward with no executive ownership
Common Disqualification Reasons:
- Too early stage (pre-revenue, <25 employees) - Most common
- Wrong buyer intent (staff aug, cheap execution) - Very common
- No operational pressure or urgency - Common
- Still debating whether data infrastructure matters - Common
Qualification Scorecard
Score Each Lead (1-10):
Company Fit (ICP):
- 10: Perfect match
- 7-9: Good match
- 4-6: Fair match
- 1-3: Poor match
Decision Maker:
- 10: C-level decision maker
- 7-9: VP/Director with authority
- 4-6: Manager/influencer
- 1-3: Individual contributor only
Pain Point:
- 10: Clear, urgent pain point
- 7-9: Identified pain point
- 4-6: Potential pain point
- 1-3: No clear pain point
Budget:
- 10: Budget confirmed
- 7-9: Budget likely
- 4-6: Budget unclear
- 1-3: No budget
Timeline:
- 10: Active project, ready to start
- 7-9: Project planned in 3-6 months
- 4-6: Project planned in 6-12 months
- 1-3: No timeline
Total Score:
- 40-50: Highly qualified - pursue aggressively
- 30-39: Qualified - pursue with standard cadence
- 20-29: Marginally qualified - low priority
- 10-19: Not qualified - disqualify
Decision Tree
Is it a good company fit? (ICP)
├─ NO → Disqualify
└─ YES
├─ Is there a decision maker?
│ ├─ NO → Disqualify
│ └─ YES
│ ├─ Do they have a pain point?
│ │ ├─ NO → Disqualify
│ │ └─ YES
│ │ ├─ Do they have budget?
│ │ │ ├─ NO → Disqualify
│ │ │ └─ YES
│ │ │ ├─ Is timing good?
│ │ │ │ ├─ NO → Nurture for later
│ │ │ │ └─ YES → QUALIFIED
Examples
Qualified Lead Example
Company: [Example company] Role: [Example role] Why Qualified:
- [Reason 1]
- [Reason 2]
- [Reason 3]
Score: [X]/50
Disqualified Lead Example
Company: [Example company] Role: [Example role] Why Disqualified:
- [Reason 1]
- [Reason 2]
Red Flags:
- [Flag 1]
- [Flag 2]
Fill in your actual qualification criteria, then we’ll use it to train agents!