Meeting Title: Slide Output Aggregation Discussion Date: 2025-08-19 Meeting participants: Samuel Roberts, Mustafa Raja
WEBVTT
1 00:02:08.449 ⇒ 00:02:09.639 Samuel Roberts: Hey.
2 00:02:10.470 ⇒ 00:02:12.080 Mustafa Raja: Hey, can you hear me?
3 00:02:12.490 ⇒ 00:02:14.260 Samuel Roberts: Yes, alright, cool.
4 00:02:14.360 ⇒ 00:02:17.879 Samuel Roberts: Yeah, so let me just share real quick. I think it’s… yeah. Okay.
5 00:02:18.560 ⇒ 00:02:20.710 Samuel Roberts: … So…
6 00:02:21.160 ⇒ 00:02:26.090 Samuel Roberts: I was just playing with the loop and stuff initially, and then I figured since we have a number of slides.
7 00:02:26.200 ⇒ 00:02:30.379 Samuel Roberts: I can run this in batch. I split it up from 1 item to 13 items.
8 00:02:31.050 ⇒ 00:02:35.149 Samuel Roberts: Just, like, very simply pulling all the output slides, right?
9 00:02:37.280 ⇒ 00:02:42.880 Samuel Roberts: So… what I’m struggling with here is that once this
10 00:02:43.440 ⇒ 00:02:47.799 Samuel Roberts: Once this finishes, I have 13 items that I just have by slide number.
11 00:02:48.730 ⇒ 00:02:53.019 Samuel Roberts: positive and negative, which I think this needs a little bit of work, but I wasn’t gonna worry about that yet.
12 00:02:53.320 ⇒ 00:02:57.569 Samuel Roberts: … I just wanna put that back.
13 00:02:58.200 ⇒ 00:03:02.600 Samuel Roberts: Together with the… Output from over here.
14 00:03:03.770 ⇒ 00:03:07.989 Samuel Roberts: And so I thought I could aggregate it, But I wasn’t sure…
15 00:03:08.550 ⇒ 00:03:17.730 Samuel Roberts: how complicated this could go, because I want to basically reconstruct the agent output, but with a little blurb
16 00:03:18.170 ⇒ 00:03:19.260 Samuel Roberts: on each one.
17 00:03:19.900 ⇒ 00:03:21.090 Samuel Roberts: Does that make sense?
18 00:03:22.520 ⇒ 00:03:24.030 Samuel Roberts: I’m talking to myself.
19 00:03:28.500 ⇒ 00:03:30.200 Samuel Roberts: Oh my goodness, okay.