Brainforge × Ambrook — Product Analytics Sprint (SOW)

Date: 2026-05-01
Version: 0.3
Client: Ambrook
Author: Brainforge (Robert Tseng, Greg Stoutenburg)

1. Executive Summary

Ambrook has scaled from roughly twenty to seven thousand customers and is expanding beyond agriculture into verticals such as trucking, construction, and real estate. Segment, HubSpot (lifecycle), and a paid/demand-gen agency each play a role; core in-product actions already feed HubSpot for engagement—an asset we build on.

The sprint addresses what’s missing for personalization at scale: workflow-aligned product analytics—clear milestones, testable segments, and a credible path from acquisition context to in-product behavior—so PMM and CS can tailor onboarding and experiments without guessing.

This SOW scopes one fixed sprint (two weeks) plus optional ad hoc hours for overflow or follow-on execution. It does not promise full instrumentation or a complete attribution loop inside the sprint; it delivers direction, prioritized next steps, and a personalization plan leadership can act on.

Investment summary

  • Workstream 1 — Product Analytics Sprint (2 weeks): $15,000 fixed.
  • Workstream 2 — Ad hoc support: Standard hourly rates, as needed (§10).

2. Objectives

  • Align on priority journeys (trial → activation; Wallet vs. accounting entry; multi-vertical contexts) and hypotheses you want to validate.
  • Document how product signals flow today (Segment → HubSpot and elsewhere) and what additional structure is needed so personalization and experiments rest on shared definitions.
  • Deliver a personalization plan (draft)—the primary outcome tying segments, signals, and intended UX/onboarding experiences—plus concrete recommendations on product analytics tooling and implementation approach (e.g. PostHog, Amplitude, Mixpanel; build vs. extend; ownership).
  • Produce a lightweight instrumentation backlog and draft tracking themes for the highest-priority workflow (full governed tracking plan and KPI map are follow-on, not completion criteria for this sprint).
  • Provide gap analysis (tooling, process, skills) and co-build guidance so outputs get used.

3. Expected ROI

OutcomeCurrent stateTarget state (after sprint)Value
Personalization readinessStrong HubSpot engagement signals; personalization roadmap not yet one shared artifactDraft personalization plan: which segments/signals should drive what experiences next (prioritized, feasible)North-star outcome—teams know who to treat how and what data must exist first
Tooling & implementation pathMultiple viable stacks; no single written recommendationWritten recommendations for product analytics tooling and phased implementationFaster decisions; fewer dead-end pilots
ExperimentationStrong instincts; baselines not always comparableHypothesis list + success metrics for agreed priority journeysClearer tests (wallet trials, paywall, onboarding variants)
Product leversQualitative understandingCandidate levers named (milestones ↔ outcomes)—not full statistical proof in two weeksProduct and GTM align on what to optimize next
TOFU ↔ productPaid side measured; end-to-end story partialPhased design—what to join when; owners—not full attribution built in sprintWallet-oriented acquisition vs. actual wallet activation becomes answerable over time
Vertical differentiationExpansion across verticalsSignal inventory—what you already capture vs. what onboarding should use nextAvoid one-size onboarding where segments differ

4. Scope of Work

4.1 In-scope

Workstream 1: Product Analytics Sprint (2 weeks)

Context: Ambrook has good signals into HubSpot for lifecycle work. The sprint adds workflow discipline and a personalization-facing plan so experiences—not only emails—can eventually reflect who the user is and how they entered the product.

Approach:

  1. Week 1 — Walk Segment, HubSpot engagement inputs, and agency/TOFU boundaries; interviews with CS and PMM (Product/Eng as available); workflow maps for agreed priority paths; inventory what already feeds personalization-adjacent decisions vs. gaps.
  2. Week 2Personalization plan (draft); hypothesis & metrics sheet; instrumentation backlog + draft tracking themes for the top workflow; tooling and implementation recommendations for product analytics; gap analysis (tooling, process, skills); co-build notes (owners, rituals).

Deliverables:

DeliverableDescription
Current-state memoSystems, flows, risks (identity, naming)
Workflow diagrams1–3 journeys with milestones (e.g. trial, paywall, first meaningful wallet vs. accounting actions)
Personalization plan (draft)Segments/signals → intended experiences → dependencies → prioritized next steps
Hypothesis & metrics briefWallet vs. accounting; vertical differences—what to test and how you’d measure
Instrumentation backlog + draft tracking themesPrioritized for sprint workflow—not a full enterprise tracking plan
Tooling & implementation recommendationsProduct analytics stack options and phased path
Gap analysisTooling, process, skills to reach target state
Co-build planWorkshops completed; owners for definitions

Acceptance criteria:

  • Stakeholders confirm workflow priority and definitions for one north-star path.
  • Personalization plan (draft) delivered and reviewed in readout.
  • Tooling recommendations for product analytics delivered in writing.
  • Deliverables in agreed shared workspace.

Workstream 2: Ad hoc hourly support

Context: Implementation, deep instrumentation, dashboard build, or extended workshops beyond the sprint capacity.

Approach: Time and materials at rates below; scoped by written approval (email or change note) before material work.

Deliverables: As agreed per request (e.g. implementation QA, additional workshops, expanded tracking spec).

4.2 Out-of-scope

  • Production engineering, SDK work, or full warehouse modeling inside Workstream 1 fixed fee (may be scoped under Workstream 2).
  • Complete TOFU ↔ product attribution built in two weeks (design and phasing only).
  • Replacement of HubSpot or agency stack.
  • Legal/vendor contract review.

5. Dependencies

Access

  • Read access to Segment and HubSpot surfaces relevant to lifecycle and events.
  • Overview of agency reporting boundaries (role clarification, not full audit).

Stakeholder time

  • Kickoff (~60 min), mid-sprint touchpoint (~30–60 min), readout (~60 min).

Documentation

  • Any existing event notes, onboarding docs, or segment definitions PMM/CS use.

6. Project Timeline

PhaseTimingFocusOutputs
Sprint2 calendar weeks from kickoffDiscovery, synthesis, readoutDeliverables in §4.1

7. Risks & Mitigations

RiskImpactMitigation
Expecting a full tracking plan / KPI system in 2 weeksHighScope limits draft themes + backlog; full model is follow-on
Unclear owners for definitionsHighCo-build plan names owners in readout
Scope creep to “full attribution”HighPhased bridge design only in sprint
HubSpot ↔ analytics naming driftMediumDocument few high-trust joins first

8. Acceptance Criteria

  • All Workstream 1 deliverables in §4.1 completed and presented.
  • Personalization plan (draft) accepted as directionally correct (not final product spec).
  • Tooling and implementation recommendations for product analytics delivered in writing.
  • CS/PMM can describe one prioritized journey and how personalization should evolve from the plan.

9. Team

Brainforge

RoleResponsibility
Managing LeadCommercial alignment, executive framing
Product Analytics LeadSprint delivery, personalization analytics

Client (suggested)

RoleInvolvement
SponsorApprovals
Customer SuccessOnboarding truth
Product MarketingSegments, acquisition, lifecycle

10. Pricing & Payment

Workstream 1 — Product Analytics Sprint

ItemFee
Two-week sprint (fixed)$15,000

Billing: 50% at signature, 50% at sprint readout (or Net 30—align with AP).

Workstream 2 — Ad hoc hourly

RoleRate (USD)
Managing Lead / Strategist$250/hour
Senior Engineer / Analytics$200/hour
Technical PM / Analyst$150/hour

Minimum billing unit: 1 hour; thereafter 0.25-hour increments. Brief coordination (≤15 minutes) not billed unless booked as working time.

Currency: USD.


11. Sign-off

By signing, both parties agree to Workstream 1 as scoped above. Workstream 2 engagements require separate written approval per request.

Client (Ambrook):
Name: ___________________________ Title: ___________________________ Date: __________ Signature: ___________________________

Brainforge:
Name: ___________________________ Title: ___________________________ Date: __________ Signature: ___________________________